Transforming Adolescent Sex Offender Treatment: Organization-Wide Change Process in a State Residential Juvenile Justice System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52935/24.3112.6Keywords:
Juvenile Justice, Adolescent Sex Offenders, Residential Treatment, Organizational Change, Evidence-Based PracticeAbstract
A state juvenile justice system underwent a system-wide organizational change process as a result of implementing a new empirically-based residential treatment model for adolescent sex offenders. Because of the significant differences between the new treatment model and the former, the change process required modifications in treatment philosophy and ideology, clinical practice, staff responsibilities and teamwork, and an understanding of applied research and the role of residential juvenile justice providers. A detailed description of the transformative change process is provided and is further examined through the lens of organizational change theory.
References
Barbaree, H. E., Hudson, S. M., & Seto, M. C. (1993). Sexual assault in society: The role of the juvenile offender. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The
juvenile sex offender (p. 1–24). New York: Guilford Press.
Barnert, E. S., Abrams, L. S., Gase, L., & Carrol, P. (2017). Setting a minimum age for juvenile
justice jurisdiction in California, International Journal of Prisoner Health (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-07-2016-003
Caldwell, M. F. (2010). Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X08330016
Cale, J., Smallbone, S., Rayment-McHugh, S., & Dowling, C. (2016). Offense trajectories, the unfolding of sexual and non-sexual criminal activity, and sex offense characteristics of adolescent sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 28(8), 791-812.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Office of Research, (2019).
Recidivism Report for Youth Released from the Division of Juvenile Justice in Fiscal Year 2014-15. Retrieved from: https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/research/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2019/12/Recidivism-Report-for-Youth-Released-from-the-Division-of-Juvenile-Justice-in-FY-2014-15.pdf
Calleja, N. G. (2013). Integrating research into practice: The Forward-Focused
Model of adolescent sexual behavior treatment. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 18, 686-694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.023
Calleja, N. G. (2015). Juvenile sexual and non-sexual offenders: A comparison
of recidivism and risk. Journal of Addiction and Offender Counseling, 36(1), 2-
12. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1874.2015.00031.x
Calleja, N. G. (2022). Developmentally-informed treatment for adolescent sex offenders: An effectiveness evaluation of the Forward-Focused Model. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 61, 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2021.2018379
Calvert, J. D., & Bauer, T. (2018). Juveniles with sexual behavior problems: A treatment program evaluation. Open Psychology, 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0001
Chouinard-Thivierge, S., Lussier, P., & Charette, Y. (2023). The adult offending outcomes of adolescents who have perpetrated a sex offense: is sexual offending in adolescence indicative of things to come?. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 21(1), 3-26.
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human relations, 69(1), 33-60.
Gardner, M., & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky
decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625
Hargreaves, C. & Francis, B. (2014). The long term recidivism risk of young sexual offenders in
England and Wales– enduring risk or redemption? Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(2), 164-172. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0047235213000561
Lewin, K. C. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Lin, J. & Jannetta, J. (2006). The Scope of Correctional Control in California. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine, Center for Evidence-Based Corrections.
Luciana, M., Barch, D., & Herting, M. M. (2023). Adolescent brain cognitive development study: Longitudinal methods, developmental findings, and associations with environmental risk factors. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 64.
Males, M., Macallair, D., & Corcoran, M. (2006). Testing Incapacitation Theory: Youth Crime
and Incarceration in California. San Francisco, CA: Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice.
Marques, M. J. K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California’s sex offender treatment and evaluation project (SOTEP) Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 79–107.
McCann, K., & Lussier, P. (2008). Antisociality, sexual deviance, and sexual reoffending in
juvenile sex offenders: A meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence and Juvenile
Justice, 6(4), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008320260
McCuish, E., Lussier, P., & Corrado, R. (2015). Criminal careers of juvenile sex and non-sex
offenders: Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204014567541
Prenzler, T., McKillop, N., Rayment-McHugh, S., & Christensen, L. (2023). Best practice in sexual offender rehabilitation and reintegration programs. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 9(3/4), 207-221.
Puzzanchera, C., Hockenberry, S., Sladky, T.J., & Kang, W. (2020). Juvenile residential
facility census databook. Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/jrfcdb/
Schweitzer, R., & Dwyer, J. (2003). Sex crime recidivism: Evaluation of a sexual offender
treatment program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,18, 1292–1310.
Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69-74.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1364661304003171
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking.
Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002
Yoder, J. R., Leibowitz, G. S., & Peterson, L. (2018). Parental and peer attachment characteristics: Differentiating between youth sexual and non-sexual offenders and associations with sexual offense profiles. Journal of interpersonal violence, 33(17), 2643-2663.
ter Beek, E., Spruit, A., Kuiper, C. H. Z., van der Rijken, R. E. A., Hendriks, J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2018). Treatment effect on recidivism for juveniles who have sexually offended: A multilevel meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(3), 543-556.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0308-3
Tidefors, I., Ingevaldson, S., & Goulding, A. (2019). Recidivism in criminal behavior: A 10-year follow-up study of 45 adolescent boys identified as sex offenders, Nordic Psychology, 71(2), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2018.1514644
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Applied Juvenile Justice Services

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.